JEDI Comport

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:51 pm**

I was watching Jamus and Corinth spar just now, and I saw that Saber Defense 5 blocks lightning before it hits absorb. I was thinking it should be the other way around when someone has absorb on.

Though I'm not entirely sure that specification is possible.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:25 pm**

If it is possible to swap it, I support. If it's not, too bad for "realism".

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:34 pm**

Coren Ran wrote:If it is possible to swap it, I support. If it's not, too bad for "realism".

I actually believe that the way it now is is more realistic.

The saber blocks and absorbs the energy. From what we know about lightsaber blades, at some point, the absorption of this energy is going to make the blade unstable. At which point it'll branch off...and the user starts to absorb it manually.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:38 pm**

Though I see the point of the suggestion, I have to agree with Corinth on this.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:43 pm**

Delmi wrote:Though I see the point of the suggestion, I have to agree with Corinth on this.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:26 pm**

Jamus Kevari wrote:
Delmi wrote:Though I see the point of the suggestion, I have to agree with Corinth on this.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 5:33 pm**

Garik Kelzim wrote:
Jamus Kevari wrote:
Delmi wrote:Though I see the point of the suggestion, I have to agree with Corinth on this.

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:44 pm**

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!!

I don't think that the specification is possible with the code.

Question though, Def 5 only blocks lightning if you are facing the attacker?

Posted: **Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:08 pm**

Sared Kilvan wrote:Question though, Def 5 only blocks lightning if you are facing the attacker?

Yes.

Posted: **Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:25 am**

Delmi wrote:Though I see the point of the suggestion, I have to agree with Corinth on this.

JEDI Comport

Saber Def 5 > Absorb VS Lightning

Saber Def 5 > Absorb VS Lightning